Search for: "SHAH v. SHAH"
Results 1 - 20
of 597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2009, 2:01 am
Ul-Haq and Another v Shah Court of Appeal “It was not possible to strike out a genuine claim on the ground that the claimant had been involved in a fraud upon the court in respect of an associated claim. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:42 am
In Shah v Federbush, 2019 WL 5060496 ( S.D. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:34 am
Deshmukh v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
Ul-Haq and others v Shah [2009] EWCA Civ 542; [2009] WLR (D) 197 “There was no general rule of law which permitted a court to strike out a genuine claim on the grounds that the claimant had been involved in a fraud upon the court in respect of an associated claim. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 2:04 am
Shah Hashmi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:47 am
–Shah v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 2:39 am
Shah and Another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd Court of Appeal “Where a bank entertained suspicion about money-laundering concerning a proposed transaction on a customer’s account, and had failed to carry out instructions promptly, the customer might be entitled to proceed with a claim in breach of contract or duty. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:05 am
Shah and another v HSBC Private Bank (UK) Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 31; [2010] WLR (D) 27 “Where a bank claimed, for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, to entertain ’suspicion’ about money-laundering concerning a proposed transaction on a customer’s account, and had failed to carry out instructions promptly, a customer might be entitled to proceed with a claim in breach of contract or duty. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:48 am
Shah v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:48 am
Shah v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Gloster and Lord Justices Patten and Richards) Caspian Pizza Ltd and Others v Shah & Another [2017] EWCA Civ 1874 (23 Nov 2017) In Caspian Pizza Ltd and Others v Shah and Another [2015] EWHC 3567 (IPEC) (9 Dec 2015) Judge Hacon dismissed a claim for trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 11:52 pm
Ahmed Khan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 1:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, January 13, 2021, Shah v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Mr Shah is a Pakistani national and primary carer of his British citizen infant son. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
Larkin v Shah, C.A. 10918-VCS (August 25, 2016) This is one of two recent Court of Chancery decisions explaining that the Corwin case really does mean that there is an “irrebuttable business judgment rule” that bars challenges to a merger approved by a majority of the fully-informed, disinterested and uncoerced stockholders, in the absence of the deal involving a controlling stockholder who suffers from a conflict in the merger. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:56 am
Aditi Shah on Lawfare looks at Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:13 am
Shah, et al., C10-0653 (W.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
Shah v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:58 am
Oral Argument in case# 10-1184; USA v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:09 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v DD (Afghanistan) [2010] EWCA Civ 1407 (10 December 2010) Dewan & Ors v Lewis [2010] EWCA Civ 1382 (09 December 2010) Shah v Shah [2010] EWCA Civ 1408 (09 December 2010) Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA v Sinochem Tianjin Ltd (Aconcagua) [2010] EWCA Civ 1403 (09 December 2010) Football Dataco Ltd & Ors v Yahoo! [read post]
